Friday, September 30, 2016

the Floods of Immigration

The Floods of Immigration
[an op-ed piece I submitted, unsuccessfully, to our local newspaper, the Register-Guard]

The United States is a nation of immigrants, which nonetheless has long held ambivalent views toward immigration. The fear and hostility Donald Trump expresses toward Mexicans resembles that aimed at Irish immigrants in the late 1700s, Italians and Bohemians in the mid 1800s, and Chinese toward the end of the 19th century.

The power and danger of immigration has often been expressed in terms of water, as a flood or a wave of immigrants. To quote from an anti-immigration book by former Colorado governor Richard Lamm, ''There is a flood of people rising right outside our door,'' suggesting that to open the door to let anyone in--or out--would bring immediate disaster. The image suggests that American citizens are passive, innocent victims of a deluge, a malevolent force of nature, not a population of other humans.

These hydraulic metaphors are not inherently racist; they can flow in many directions. In the nineteenth century Anglo-Americans including Henry David Thoreau wrote proudly of a wave or current of Anglo-Saxons flowing across America, drowning out the native Indians. Native Americans in the Northeast, whose origin myths tell of a primordial flood like the Noachian deluge in the Bible, may have also spoken of the dangers of a flood of Europeans invading their land.

Donald Trump has boasted that he will build a wall along the U.S. Mexican border, and make Mexicans pay for it. Long stretches of wall have already been built along the border in Southern California and Arizona since the 1990s. Before then the border was nearly all unfortified. Illegal immigration has risen and fallen over the decades in response to economic and social forces, and migrants and the coyotes who exploit them appear little troubled by the walls. A ladder, a tunnel, a blowtorch or even a pile of rocks  can easily get people past the wall, which is much less effective in reality than in political rhetoric. The wall is as much a metaphor as the flood of immigrants. The steep mountains, sandy arroyos, and meandering Rio Grande River of the American Southwest cannot be sealed off by any wall, no matter how many billions of dollars are spent in the effort.

To imagine a wall on the U.S. border holding back a flood of aliens is to portray the entire U.S. as if it were like New Orleans, a city founded in 1718 (by French and Canadian immigrants) on natural levees alongside the Mississippi River. Since then New Orleans has expanded into bayou swamps that have sunk below sea level. As all America saw in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, a fragile system of dikes, dams, and pumps is needed to protect New Orleans, and the storm surge from a hurricane can overtop the levees.

The wall politicians want to build aims to keep out a metaphorical flood of immigrants. They walls politicians ought to build are needed to hold back real floods of water. The world’s oceans are rising due to rising temperatures, melting glaciers and ice-caps. The Atlantic has risen six inches in the last century along most of the East Coast, and is forecast to rise three to four feet by 2100. A three foot rise would displace 4.2 million Americans from their homes in cities like New Orleans, Miami, and Newport News, Virginia. These climate refugees would become domestic immigrants, forced to seek housing, jobs and welfare in other communities. They cannot be deported.

Will levees and sea-walls protect our nation from the flood tides of the future? The recent experience of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy shows that expensive new infrastructure is urgently needed. The steeper coast of Oregon faces less risk from a small rise in the ocean, but a three foot increase would affect Portland itself. Some areas cannot be protected. In South Florida the bedrock is porous limestone, threaded with caves and tunnels. Walls along the shore there will not hold back the higher tides.

Walls make nice political slogans, but like many politicians’ promises, they are riddled with holes. To protect America from these floods, real and figurative, we need to address root causes: rising temperatures worldwide, and wars and violence in Central America.


Gordon Sayre is Professor of English at the University of Oregon